Traditional blog platforms (think WordPress, Blogger) were designed for desktops and laptops -- not for smartphones and tablets. Which means that your blog may look strange and hard to read on your IPhone or IPad (or other phone or tablet device) unless you've taken steps to accommodate these new smaller-screen devices.
How can you find out how your blog appears to readers using a smartphone or tablet?
The easiest way to check is to grab a smartphone or tablet and go to your blog's home page. Is it hard to read -- are you seeing more of the left sidebar than the posts themselves?
Other ways to check: go to websites like TestiPhone.com or iPhone tester to see how things look on a smartphone's small screen.
If the blog looks wonky, call your webmaster and get this fixed.
For most blogging platforms, it's an easy fix. Wordpress has a plugin that solves the problem; Blogger does it automatically. (Blogger also provides its own preview for how Blogger blogs look on these smaller screen devices.)
Why should you care what device is used to read your blog?
Don't get overwhelmed. The biggest hurdle here is taking the time to check the blog's appearance on various tablets and smartphones; changing things to accommodate the smaller screen is simple to do.
It's an important task to undertake as soon as you can, though: it's estimated that more readers are going to be reading blog posts on smartphones and tablets than desktops and laptops very soon (think weeks or months), so getting your blog adapted for those smaller screens is a priority.
BOTTOM LINE? A hard to read blog post on a smartphone may remain an unread blog post -- and your time and effort in creating those blog posts deserves better, so make it easy for the smartphone reader to pull up and read what you've written.
For more, check out Forbes' article, " Smartphones, Tablets, Tab-Phones Edging PCs Off The Shelf?" and Econsultancy's take on things in "Smartphones and tablets: five key differences."
Even more? Read this piece written back in 2011 on Wikipedia, where Wikipedians are pondering where most of their readers are reading Wikipedia articles then (2011) and where those readers are going to be reading Wikipedia articles in the future.
12/1/13
10/28/13
Can LinkedIn Get Lawyers In Trouble With Their State Bar? Maybe
LinkedIn provides a great service for professionals, and lots of lawyers are members of the online site. However, given the prohibitions placed upon attorneys by their respective bars and supervising authorities over marketing, solicitation, maintaining the appearance of propriety, etc., there's been a lot of discussion over how attorneys can be active on LinkedIn without getting in trouble with their State Bar Associations or State Supreme Courts.
Skills and Expertise in LinkedIn Bios - Careful About Those Practice Areas
Consider the recent Florida Bar Association advisory opinion on LinkedIn's profiles. It is the opinion of the Florida regulatory authority that Florida lawyers should not list his or her practice areas under the "Skills and Expertise" section of their LinkedIn bio unless they have achieved Board Certification.
For those who follow LinkedIn regularly, this may seem a little over the top. Still, Florida lawyers -- know that you cannot list your practices in the Skills and Expertise section until something changes with the Florida Bar.
And that's not all.
Endorsements? Uninvited LinkedIn Endorsements May Not Meet State Bar Approval, Either.
You've seen all those endorsements that pop up for you? People you know well or barely at all, endorsing you for all sorts of things?
Well, if those endorsements involve legal areas, then take heed. Maybe these will get you in trouble with your State Bar, too, even though you have had zip to do with being endorsed. These are uninvited surprises to LinkedIn members as other people take the step to endorse them for something. It's not done by the lawyer.
From the Bar's perspective, these endorsements may be in violation of Bar Rules. Florida may find them to be in violation of the same Ethics Rule that bars the above Skills and Expertise listing of practice areas: in Florida, it may be that these endorsements can only be legally placed on an attorney's LinkedIn page if that Florida lawyer is Board Certified in that area.
Illinois, according to opinions given in the Illinois Bar Association, finds that LinkedIn endorsements for Illinois lawyers is okay with the Illinois Bar.
For more on the Florida endorsement issue, go here for local lawyers' take on things and go here to read Robert Ambrogi's discussion of the situation.
Skills and Expertise in LinkedIn Bios - Careful About Those Practice Areas
Consider the recent Florida Bar Association advisory opinion on LinkedIn's profiles. It is the opinion of the Florida regulatory authority that Florida lawyers should not list his or her practice areas under the "Skills and Expertise" section of their LinkedIn bio unless they have achieved Board Certification.
For those who follow LinkedIn regularly, this may seem a little over the top. Still, Florida lawyers -- know that you cannot list your practices in the Skills and Expertise section until something changes with the Florida Bar.
And that's not all.
Endorsements? Uninvited LinkedIn Endorsements May Not Meet State Bar Approval, Either.
You've seen all those endorsements that pop up for you? People you know well or barely at all, endorsing you for all sorts of things?
Well, if those endorsements involve legal areas, then take heed. Maybe these will get you in trouble with your State Bar, too, even though you have had zip to do with being endorsed. These are uninvited surprises to LinkedIn members as other people take the step to endorse them for something. It's not done by the lawyer.
From the Bar's perspective, these endorsements may be in violation of Bar Rules. Florida may find them to be in violation of the same Ethics Rule that bars the above Skills and Expertise listing of practice areas: in Florida, it may be that these endorsements can only be legally placed on an attorney's LinkedIn page if that Florida lawyer is Board Certified in that area.
Illinois, according to opinions given in the Illinois Bar Association, finds that LinkedIn endorsements for Illinois lawyers is okay with the Illinois Bar.
For more on the Florida endorsement issue, go here for local lawyers' take on things and go here to read Robert Ambrogi's discussion of the situation.
10/14/13
Prenda Lawyers: The Zaniness Just Keeps On Coming — But When Are These Guys Going to Get Zapped?
“So, what’s the latest with Prenda?” asked my client, and instead of filling him in on things personally, I thought I’d just post an update here.
First of all, you may remember Prenda (we’ve been following their antics for awhile now). Now, there’s even a nice summary page over at Wikipedia, where the Prenda Law Firm is described as “… a Chicago, Illinois-based law firm that claims it battles copyright piracy, but is also strongly identified with copyright trolling.”
BoingBoing labels them grifters, but whatever.
Prenda, or following what’s happening in courts all over the country delving into Prenda-activities, is just a hoot. Yes, maybe a geeky-lawyer hoot, but a hoot nevertheless.
For the latest, check out Techdirt’s latest (they’ve been doing a great job of tracking Prenda stuff), “Report From The Court Room On Latest Prenda Hearing In Minnesota: Another Hearing, Another Mess,” by Nancy Sims as well as its recap, “Prenda Soap Opera: Steele Contradicts His Own Previous Claims, Lutz Disappears Again... And The Mother-in-Law Surprise.”
For even more, there’s Boing Boing’s article “Porno copyright troll John Steele accused of identity theft -- by his mother-in-law,” which includes a link to their earlier coverage.
A tidbit of things: Prenda’s Mark Lutz never seems to show up. He’s been a no show in court, he’s failed to come to depositions, and the excuses as to why Lutz isn’t where he’s suppose to be are amazing not only in how long it takes to provide one, but the reasons for his no-show are worthy of a jaw-drop in their own right.
There’s simply too much here to share in a short blog post, but hopefully these links will help you catch up with this infamous Porno Copyright as a Practice Area law firm.
First of all, you may remember Prenda (we’ve been following their antics for awhile now). Now, there’s even a nice summary page over at Wikipedia, where the Prenda Law Firm is described as “… a Chicago, Illinois-based law firm that claims it battles copyright piracy, but is also strongly identified with copyright trolling.”
BoingBoing labels them grifters, but whatever.
Prenda, or following what’s happening in courts all over the country delving into Prenda-activities, is just a hoot. Yes, maybe a geeky-lawyer hoot, but a hoot nevertheless.
For the latest, check out Techdirt’s latest (they’ve been doing a great job of tracking Prenda stuff), “Report From The Court Room On Latest Prenda Hearing In Minnesota: Another Hearing, Another Mess,” by Nancy Sims as well as its recap, “Prenda Soap Opera: Steele Contradicts His Own Previous Claims, Lutz Disappears Again... And The Mother-in-Law Surprise.”
For even more, there’s Boing Boing’s article “Porno copyright troll John Steele accused of identity theft -- by his mother-in-law,” which includes a link to their earlier coverage.
A tidbit of things: Prenda’s Mark Lutz never seems to show up. He’s been a no show in court, he’s failed to come to depositions, and the excuses as to why Lutz isn’t where he’s suppose to be are amazing not only in how long it takes to provide one, but the reasons for his no-show are worthy of a jaw-drop in their own right.
There’s simply too much here to share in a short blog post, but hopefully these links will help you catch up with this infamous Porno Copyright as a Practice Area law firm.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)