10/19/17
10/16/17
Dictating with Free Google Docs Voice Recognition Software
When I first purchased Dragon, I used the ill-fitting headphones provided with the package because the documentation explained this was best for accuracy. It was vital to keep the mike in a set position near to your mouth, too. You had to remember your placement each time you decided to dictate.
It's even more depressing to think about how
much time I spent reading speeches by John F. Kennedy and chapters from Alice in Wonderland into Dragon in order
to increase the accuracy of my fancy personal voice recognition software.
Nuance (the software maker) provided all sorts
of lengthy content for this purpose. It
was interesting enough. It was also time
consuming. And periodically, I would
upgrade and have to go back to square one, re-reading Alice aloud once again.
See, e.g., my
2009 post “Dragon
Naturally Speaking 10 - Highly Recommend It, 99% Accuracy.”
Time and money. I spent a lot of time and money on Dragon.
.
I Adore Google Docs’ Voice Recognition Software
Right now, I'm dictating this blog post using
Google Docs’ Voice-Typing tool.
And I’m amazed.
The accuracy is better than Dragon from the get-go. I haven’t had to dictate a single speech or
book chapter.
Even more wonderful, I’m dictating as I sit
comfortably in front of my laptop, the television chattering in the background
and the dog snoozing at my feet. No
cords! No headset! No careful enunciation. Just chattering
away.
And the price is right! It’s free!
Time and money. I’m saving so much time and money with Google
Docs.
.
Sure, I Still Have to Edit
Of course, I have to edit what I've dictated in
Google Docs. That’s partly my fault, though: I have a bad habit of saying “next
paragraph” instead of “new paragraph” for one thing.
Editing was a must with Dragon, as well. Who doesn’t edit after they’ve dictated? Not sure having to edit the dictation is a
drawback here.
.
You May Love Google’s Voice Recognition Alternative to Dragon, Too
So, Dear Reader, here’s the thing. I admit I was a snoot about Dragon and
assumed it was superior to the freebie tool in Google Docs.
I was wrong.
I apologize, Google Docs.
And I am so happy right now: not having to wear
a headset, as I'm speaking in a normal tone and my laptop's microphone is
catching everything I'm saying.
It's wonderful. I love this.
Maybe you will, too.
.
Will I Use It For NaNoWriMo 2017? Dunno.
As for a National Novel Writing Month, I still
plan on handwriting my novel again this year. I enjoy writing fast and sloppy with
a pen and paper; that is part of my NaNoWriMo fun.
Still, as November progresses and my word count
falls behind schedule, I may be tempted to dictate some of my stuff.
I know the fact that I can dictate quickly into
Google Docs, just staring at my laptop screen, and get this level of
recognition and speed is something I'm going to remember.
.
10/9/17
Microsoft Word Add-In From Kindle: New Self-Publishing Software
Amazon is offering an Add-In for Microsoft Word (beginning with Word 2010). From Kindle Direct Publishing, the Add-In allows you to do the following:
- Format your manuscript by specifying styles like Chapter Title, Chapter Subtitle and others.
- Save time by using pre-formatted sample pages like book title, copyright, dedication to complete your book.
- Preview your book any time as it would look to customers reading on Tablets, Phones and Kindle E-readers before publishing.
- Work in Microsoft Word and publish your .doc/.docx manuscript as an eBook or paperback with Kindle Direct Publishing.
Beta Testing for Both KDP Word Add-In and Kindle Create
It’s new, and it’s offered in beta, which means some indie
publishers may nix using it right off the bat.
Why? Beta can be scary. That’s because “beta” by definition
means not all the kinks are ironed out of the product.
However, if you are beta-brave, then you might like Kindle
Direct Publishing’s Microsoft Word Add-In.
.
.
Kindle Create Still Available
This does not replace KDP’s original Kindle Create. You’re free to choose between them. In fact, Amazon explains that they are
separate tools, and that files cannot be moved between them.
.
.
The initial Kindle Create has been available for several
months. According to Amazon, Kindle
Create allows you to do the following:
- Quickly apply a book theme to match your story.
- Detect and style chapter titles automatically.
- Preview your book any time as it would look to customers reading on Tablets, Phones and Kindle E-readers before publishing.
- Works with .doc and .docx files exported from applications like Microsoft Word, Google Docs, Apple Pages, Scrivener and others.
What They Offer the Writer - Publisher
Amazon explains that both these beta tools offer the writer-publisher
a way to compile content into an e-book or paperback format.
- Each tool provides the writer – publisher with an opportunity to apply “themes” to your content (KDP themes listed are Classic, Modern, Amour and Cosmos).
- Both allow the writer “preview functionality” for phones, tablets, and e-readers.
- Either version enables the writer to create a
table of contents using chapter titles.
Kindle for Self-Published E-books
For many folk, getting your e-book published for Kindle e-readers
and sold via the e-book market on Amazon.com is enough.
That’s fine. It may not be the best option for maximizing your exposure and sales, but focusing on
the Amazon marketplace isn’t a bad thing.
Which means Amazon offering a new compilation tool provided
within Microsoft’s popular word processing software Word seems like a great
tool for lots of writers.
I think I’ll try it out.
It’s on my task list, anyway.
.
.
Word vs. Scrivener
However, my real interest here is how this enhances Word for
self-publishing. It’s making it more
comparable to Scrivener.
Maybe the real news here isn’t the alternative in KDP
(Kindle Direct Publishing) compilation tools.
The big deal here may be
the new power of Microsoft Word to compile content for publication. For some writers, will this be enough of a
temptation to return to Word after they’ve been using Scrivener?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


